Recently, the brilliant British astrophysicist Stephen Hawking made a remark that shocked the world: from all the mysteries, the only mystery has never solved is the mistery of the woman. And it's no surprise that fact, as it is at par with the opinion issued many years ago from another of the major intellectual figures: Sigmund Freud, who admitted that in his years of practice of psychoanalysis, had never been able to understand women.
If then we have two types considered remarkable in their respective fields have struggled to think reasonably about the status of women, what could be for us, the rest of us? I'm not trying to make me of pessimistic ideas, recognizing that there are terms called ''female codes'', whose appearance can indicate the way to go when it comes to unraveling the mystery of the woman.
The word ''No'': nothing is more difficult to get one real ''yes'' from a woman, but not to make us feel bad and leave us with the word in the mouth, they often appeal to ''no'' as response, albeit forced by her education. The female ''no'' is more than an adverb of negation. That word from the lips of a woman, becomes of the most terrible of weapons used to crush the human spirit. Imagine the people traumatized in childhood felt the terrible effects of ''no'' said from our mothers: No way! No high music! No baseball! Then still suffering from the memory of the trauma, but from the mouth of your partner I suppose: No way! No high music! No baseball!
The word ''Maybe'': Thousands years ago women discovered how to alter time and space intervals (something scientists just found out), answering questions in the adverb of doubt ''Maybe'', which for practical purposes becomes little more than a condemnation. Christian theologians might consider the ''femininen maybe'' as a mystical mantra that confined to men to the limbo of souls. When she answers ''Maybe'' with a honeyed smile, this automatically implies immediate response will not find any of our requirements. The answer has some meanings, as some soulless women that say the: ''perhaps'' and ''it could be'' in specific cases: ''My love, do you love me? Oh I don't know, maybe...''.
The word ''That'': a humble adjective demonstrative from female voices that acquires a stigma almost as a biblical power. Just like the lion's roar plaguing the African jungles, the use of this word from a woman means a declaration of war, invasion of the enemy territory without take prisoners. Its use is a privilege exclusively female, that becomes a situation incompatible with life when they say: ''Where were you?... You were with that?''..
If then we have two types considered remarkable in their respective fields have struggled to think reasonably about the status of women, what could be for us, the rest of us? I'm not trying to make me of pessimistic ideas, recognizing that there are terms called ''female codes'', whose appearance can indicate the way to go when it comes to unraveling the mystery of the woman.
The word ''No'': nothing is more difficult to get one real ''yes'' from a woman, but not to make us feel bad and leave us with the word in the mouth, they often appeal to ''no'' as response, albeit forced by her education. The female ''no'' is more than an adverb of negation. That word from the lips of a woman, becomes of the most terrible of weapons used to crush the human spirit. Imagine the people traumatized in childhood felt the terrible effects of ''no'' said from our mothers: No way! No high music! No baseball! Then still suffering from the memory of the trauma, but from the mouth of your partner I suppose: No way! No high music! No baseball!
The word ''Maybe'': Thousands years ago women discovered how to alter time and space intervals (something scientists just found out), answering questions in the adverb of doubt ''Maybe'', which for practical purposes becomes little more than a condemnation. Christian theologians might consider the ''femininen maybe'' as a mystical mantra that confined to men to the limbo of souls. When she answers ''Maybe'' with a honeyed smile, this automatically implies immediate response will not find any of our requirements. The answer has some meanings, as some soulless women that say the: ''perhaps'' and ''it could be'' in specific cases: ''My love, do you love me? Oh I don't know, maybe...''.
The word ''That'': a humble adjective demonstrative from female voices that acquires a stigma almost as a biblical power. Just like the lion's roar plaguing the African jungles, the use of this word from a woman means a declaration of war, invasion of the enemy territory without take prisoners. Its use is a privilege exclusively female, that becomes a situation incompatible with life when they say: ''Where were you?... You were with that?''..
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario